머스크, SEC 트위터 지분 소송에 150만 달러 지불

hackernews | | 📰 뉴스
#뉴스
원문 출처: hackernews · Genesis Park에서 요약 및 분석

요약

일론 머스크는 2022년 트위터 지분 확대 과정에서 적시에 공시를 하지 않은 혐의에 대해 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)의 조사를 받았으나, 당초 요구됐던 2억 달러보다 훨씬 낮은 150만 달러를 지불하고 합의했습니다. SEC는 지분 공시 지연이 트위터 주주들에게 1억 5,000만 달러의 손해를 끼쳤다고 주장했지만, 머스크 측은 위반 사실을 인정하지 않은 상태로 이번 합의안이 법원의 승인을 기다리고 있습니다. 이번 사건과 관련해 머스크는 여전히 별도의 집단 소송에 직면해 있습니다.

본문

Musk to pay $1.5 million over SEC Twitter stake case - Elon Musk agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle SEC allegations that he improperly withheld disclosure of his expanding Twitter stake in 2022, significantly less than the agency’s initial $200-million demand. - The SEC claimed the delayed disclosure cost Twitter shareholders $150 million as Musk accumulated shares at a discount before the stock surged 27% upon proper filing of his ownership stake. - The settlement marks the SEC’s largest penalty for a late beneficial ownership report filing, though Musk still faces a separate class-action investor lawsuit over the same missed disclosure deadline. Elon Musk agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission allegations that he cheated Twitter shareholders in 2022 by failing to properly disclose his growing stake in the social media company. An Elon Musk revocable trust would pay the penalty to end the SEC’s lawsuit under the plan, which is still subject to court approval. Musk didn’t admit to the regulator’s allegations, according to a filing Monday. It’s a much smaller penalty than what Musk’s attorney said the SEC initially sought. The agency in December 2024 asked Musk to pay more than $200 million to settle, according to a letter his lawyers sent to the agency and reviewed by Bloomberg News. The SEC sued Musk in January 2025, days before President Trump took office, alleging Musk blew the deadline to disclose he had accumulated more than 5% of the social-media platform’s stock. That delay cost Twitter shareholders more than $150 million, the regulator said. Musk later bought the company in 2022 and renamed it X. An SEC spokesperson said the deal, if finalized, would be the largest penalty the agency has levied against an entity or individual for allegedly failing to file a beneficial ownership report on time. Musk’s attorney, however, called it a “small fine.” “Mr. Musk has now been cleared of all issues related to the late filing of forms in the Twitter acquisition, as we said from the outset he would be,” Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk, said in a statement. “A trust vehicle has agreed to a small fine for being late on one filing.” The SEC originally sought a civil penalty and a return of illegal profits, plus interest. The deal announced Monday represents only a civil penalty. At the time of the January 2025 lawsuit, Musk was a key Trump ally who had donated hundreds of millions of dollars to help him get elected. Once Trump took office, Musk oversaw a massive restructuring of the federal government before having a public falling-out with the president. The case was also fraught within the agency. Commissioner Mark Uyeda, a Republican who later would serve as the SEC’s acting chairman, took the unusual step of asking enforcement staff members to declare the case wasn’t motivated by politics, Bloomberg News reported in February 2025. The agency said that the billionaire taking a huge position in the company would have sent the stock price soaring if the public knew and that investors who sold their shares missed out on big gains. Musk also stockpiled shares at an unfair discount behind the scenes, according to the lawsuit. Once he properly disclosed his purchase, Twitter shares surged 27%, the lawsuit said. The SEC first started probing Musk’s Twitter purchases in 2022. In September 2024, Musk stood up SEC attorneys who flew to Los Angeles for his deposition in the case, choosing to attend a rocket launch for his SpaceX company instead. Musk offered a few thousand dollars to cover the government lawyers’ travel expenses. The agency balked. When the SEC filed its lawsuit, Musk’s attorney accused the agency of waging a multi-year “campaign of harassment” against the billionaire. He said at the time that the type of allegations against Musk would normally carry only a nominal penalty. Musk sought to dismiss the SEC’s case in August, calling it “a waste of this court’s time and taxpayer resources.” The SEC responded by urging the judge to find Musk liable without a trial and said there is “absolutely no dispute” that the billionaire missed the deadline. Musk still faces a class-action investor suit over the same missed disclosure deadline. White writes for Bloomberg.

Genesis Park 편집팀이 AI를 활용하여 작성한 분석입니다. 원문은 출처 링크를 통해 확인할 수 있습니다.

공유

관련 저널 읽기

전체 보기 →