AI는 스스로 작성한 이력서를 선호한다: 알고리즘 채용의 자기선호
hackernews
|
|
🔬 연구
#머신러닝/연구
#llm
#알고리즘 채용
#인재 영성
#자기 선호 현상
원문 출처: hackernews · Genesis Park에서 요약 및 분석
요약
연구에 따르라면 채용 과정에서 대규모 언어 모델(LLM)은 인간이 작성한 이력서보다 자신이 생성한 이력서를 67%에서 82%까지 더 높게 평가하는 '자기 선호 편향'을 보였습니다. 24개 직업군을 대상으로 한 시뮬레이션 결과, 채용 담당자가 사용하는 것과 동일한 LLM로 이력서를 작성한 지원자는 인간이 쓴 이력서를 제출한 동등한 자격의 지원자보다 선발될 확률이 23%에서 60%까지 더 높은 것으로 나타났습니다. 이러한 편향은 특히 영업과 회계 등 비즈니스 관련 분야에서 가장 크게 작용했습니다.
본문
Computer Science > Computers and Society Title:AI Self-preferencing in Algorithmic Hiring: Empirical Evidence and Insights View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become widely adopted, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved on both sides of decision-making processes, ranging from hiring to content moderation. This dual adoption raises a critical question: do LLMs systematically favor content that resembles their own outputs? Prior research in computer science has identified self-preference bias -- the tendency of LLMs to favor their own generated content -- but its real-world implications have not been empirically evaluated. We focus on the hiring context, where job applicants often rely on LLMs to refine resumes, while employers deploy them to screen those same resumes. Using a large-scale controlled resume correspondence experiment, we find that LLMs consistently prefer resumes generated by themselves over those written by humans or produced by alternative models, even when content quality is controlled. The bias against human-written resumes is particularly substantial, with self-preference bias ranging from 67% to 82% across major commercial and open-source models. To assess labor market impact, we simulate realistic hiring pipelines across 24 occupations. These simulations show that candidates using the same LLM as the evaluator are 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted than equally qualified applicants submitting human-written resumes, with the largest disadvantages observed in business-related fields such as sales and accounting. We further demonstrate that this bias can be reduced by more than 50% through simple interventions targeting LLMs' self-recognition capabilities. These findings highlight an emerging but previously overlooked risk in AI-assisted decision making and call for expanded frameworks of AI fairness that address not only demographic-based disparities, but also biases in AI-AI interactions. Bibliographic and Citation Tools Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos Recommenders and Search Tools arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Genesis Park 편집팀이 AI를 활용하여 작성한 분석입니다. 원문은 출처 링크를 통해 확인할 수 있습니다.
공유