터무니없는 연구에 따르면 과일과 채소를 섭취하면 암에 걸릴 수 있다고 한다
Ars Technica
|
|
{'이벤트': '📰', '머신러닝/연구': '📰', '하드웨어/반도체': '📰', '취약점/보안': '📰', '기타 AI': '📰', 'AI 딜': '📰', 'AI 모델': '📰', 'AI 서비스': '📰', 'discount': '📰', 'news': '📰', 'review': '📰', 'tip': '📰'} 머신러닝/연구
#머신러닝/연구
요약
최근 로버트 F. 케네디 보건장관의 임명 이후 육류 위주의 식단과 같은 의심스러운 건강 조언이 확산되는 가운데, 채소와 과일 섭취가 폐암 위험을 높인다는 논란이 된 연구 결과가 발표되었습니다. 이 주장은 수십 년간 축적된 영양학적 증거와 정면으로 배치되나, 아직 해당 연구의 전문은 공개되지 않은 상황입니다. 전문가들은 이번 연구 결과가 신빙성이 없다고 입을 모으며 엉터리 연구라는 비판을 가하고 있습니다.
왜 중요한가
본문
Dubious nutrition research and downright terrible diet and health advice are nothing new, but the situation has devolved as of late. With the rise of anti-vaccine Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, federal food guidelines have centered on slabs of meat, excessive amounts of protein, and sticks of butter. The animal-based food craze has people slathering beef tallow on their faces. And, if your cardiovascular system isn't already hardening just reading this, health influencers are now peddling nicotine—an addictive drug considered to be a cardiovascular toxin. With this bananas context came headlines in the past few days suggesting that eating fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can be bad for you. Specifically, it can increase the risk of lung cancer—a claim that flies in the face of decades of evidence-based nutrition guidance, like a full-fat cream pie. The full study behind the headlines hasn't been published yet, but experts have seen enough to call it baloney. The study is being presented at the American Association for Cancer Research conference this week and hasn’t been peer reviewed. Based on the abstract available online, the study was small, had no appropriate control group, led to a finding not previously hypothesized, used groupings that were "arbitrary," is likely picking up on a known correlation, and jumps to speculation based on no data from the study.Read full article Comments