뉴스피드 큐레이션 SNS 대시보드 저널

O2Fail – 휴대폰 콘텐츠 제어에 대해 알아야 할 사항(2010)

hackernews | | 💼 비즈니스
#o2 #tip #모바일 #성인 콘텐츠 #콘텐츠 제어 #필터링

요약

O2가 성인 콘텐츠 필터를 도입하며 구글 번역 등 일반 사이트까지 차단하는 오류를 일으켜 비판을 받았습니다. 정부의 강력한 규제 도입 위협과 언론의 악몽 같은 보도를 우려해 통신사들이 지나치게 보수적인 검열을 하고 있기 때문입니다. 하지만 타블로이드지의 노출 사진은 '가족 친화적'이라 차단하지 않는 등 이중적인 기준을 적용하고 있습니다. 결국 비효율적이고 성인에게는 불편한 이 시스템은 통신사의 이익 보호를 위해 형식적으로 유지되고 있습니다.

왜 중요한가

개발자 관점

검토중입니다

연구자 관점

검토중입니다

비즈니스 관점

검토중입니다

본문

So, O2 has apparently angered the Internet Gods by switching on its Adult Content Filter. This means anyone who wants to look at adult material on the web will have to pay a fee to prove they are over 18. Of course, their filter is broken - so it's caught sites like Google Translate and B3ta and banned access to them. And, naturally, there's no easy way to unlock this bar without walking into an O2 store and shouting loudly and proudly "I LIKE MASTURBATING AND WOULD LIKE MY PHONE UNLOCKED SO I CAN LOOK AT PORNOGRAPHY AND MASTURBATE. And then translate it into Russian via Google Translate." I've written before about censoring the web. I also used to work for a Mobile Network Operator looking after, in amongst everything else, adult media. You can watch my video from SMC London discussing how (some) MNOs approach adult material. I think it's fair to say I know a little bit about this subject. In my attempt to educate the world, let me explain some things about mobile Internet filters. There are only five things you need to know... There is no government regulation, nor law telling mobile phone operators they have to block adult content. The government has said "Regulate yourselves, or we'll impose regulation upon you." This is a fairly common trick. You may have heard it expressed as "Nice business you've got there. It would be a shame if anything ... happened to it..." But, as we will see, it's not just the threat of red tape that keeps people up at night. What every MNO live in fear of, is the Daily Mail headline which runs... PERVERTS! Now Sick Mobile Phone Bosses Peddle Porn To YOUR CHILDREN (and you have to pay for it!) That's it. Game over. Share price plummets, you lose your job, your name's in the papers and you lose your kids in a custody battle. Fear drives people to be ultra-conservative even when they realise what they are doing is irrational. I know what you're thinking. That's a porno-shot of Linda Lusardi. Obviously, that's unsuitable for children. You could not be more wrong. Ever since 17th November, 1970 - when The Sun published a nude photo of Stephanie Rahn - shots like this have been counted as "family friendly". Essentially, Rupert Murdoch doesn't run a porn empire - therefore, anything which appears in The Sun is family friendly. And if you try to classify it under "Adult" they'll sue the arse off you. Allegedly. Simply put: porn isn't porn when it appears in The Sun. That's why most UK MNOs don't block page three - indeed, it's why they're quite willing to sell soft-core pornography to anyone, regardless of age. The hypocrisy of the tabloid media is quite something to behold. Campaign's like Brook's Sex Positive often fall foul of automated content checking. Because they have words like "vagina", "orgasm", and "contraception" - it's easy for computers to get confused and think that they are porn. So, kids can see topless women but they can't learn how to put on a condom. Helpful. There are two things which regularly fail with censoring. - False Negative. You can't catch every dirty image on the Internet. - False Positives. It's easy to misclassify "safe" sites as "bad" sites. Wanking is legal in this country. There's no good reason why anyone should have to go on record as saying that want to look at wobbly bits. Because it's easy for a kid to find a site that isn't blocked - or to "borrow" mum or dad's credit card - it's of no serious concern to the intrepid kid. It does suck if they want to find out how not to get AIDS though. So, we're stuck with a situation that's expensive for MNOs, embarrassing and annoying for consenting adults, and trivial for a child to bypass. Everyone knows that mobile web censorship doesn't work. But it has to be done otherwise the media will get upset. If the press get upset - then you get upset. So it's all for your own good. 8 thoughts on “#O2Fail - What You Need To Know About Mobile Phone Content Control” Scott Hughes What is most ironic about this is that in a world of WiFi devices this is even sillier than it seems. It's perfectly possible to access a "forbidden" site at home on a WiFi network and then be blocked as you leave the house! Solarisfire Wow some of your facts are glaringly wrong. O2 has switched on its adult content filter? No it just finished switching it on, its been on for most devices for many years, and no1 complained. You can unlock it by phoning up, or by using a web page. You don't have to shout it out in store. The government is involved, O2 was the LAST provider to turn on something like this. And Tony Blair was about to impose sanction if they didn't, it was discussed behind closed doors, not in the public eye, as they didn't want outrage from millions of parents going zomg my son can look at boobs on his phone someone must answer for this. I'd prefer children not to see that chicks boobs. Yes the blacklist that they are running on isn't flawless, but it will evolve, improve, and eventually sites like that will not be banned. Te

관련 저널 읽기

전체 보기 →