1. **Analyze the Request:** * **Role:** News summarization expert. * **Task:** Summarize the provided article concisely. * **Constraint 1:** 2-4 sentences. * **Constraint 2:** Focus on important information. * **Constraint 3:** No copy-pasting. * **Constraint 4:** Don't just restate the title; add new info. * **Language:** English. * **Input:** Title and link context (HackerNews) but the "Article Text" is empty in the prompt provided by the user, aside from the title being repeated. *Wait, let me double-check the input.* The user provided the title "Claude Code for the Semi-Reluctant, Somewhat Curious Rails Developer" and the source "hackernews", but the "Article Text" is just the title again. I cannot summarize an article I haven't seen. *Self-Correction/Assumption:* Often, when users provide a title and source like this, they might have forgotten to paste the text, OR they expect me to access external knowledge (like if this is a well-known specific article), OR they want a summary based *only* on the title (which contradicts "Add new information beyond the title"). *Hypothesis:* This looks like a specific blog post or article. "Claude Code" is Anthropic's CLI tool. "Rails Developer" suggests it's about using AI in Ruby on Rails development. *However*, as an AI, I should not hallucinate content of a specific link if the text isn't provided. *But*, looking at the prompt again, the "Article Text" section is empty/redundant. *Alternative:* Maybe the user *is* asking me to summarize the *concept* based on the title, implying I should know what
본문
You've heard the hype. You've rolled your eyes at a few AI demos. You're not trying to rewrite your app from scratch... you just want to get some things done without losing your mind. Fair enough. Let's talk. Your teammates who've been experimenting with this for the past few months have an unfair advantage right now. This guide is about closing that gap, without the hype or the rewrites. By default, Claude Code asks before it edits files, runs commands, or makes changes. It will pause and check with you. This is a feature, not a bug. If you're seeing Claude make changes without asking, you (or someone on your team) probably started the session with --dangerously-skip-permissions . That flag exists, it has its uses, but understand what you're enabling when you use it. Verify everything Claude writes before you commit it. The default behavior is your friend, especially when you're still getting a feel for how it works. Before Claude starts editing files, put it in plan mode first. Press Shift+Tab twice to cycle into plan mode (you'll see ⸠plan mode on at the bottom of the terminal). Claude can read files, search your codebase, and reason, but it can't edit, write, or run commands. It'll walk you through its proposed approach without touching anything. This is genuinely useful when you're dealing with unfamiliar code, a risky refactor, or any time you want a second opinion before something changes. Once you've reviewed the plan and you're happy with the direction, press Shift+Tab again to cycle back into normal mode and tell Claude to proceed. Make this your default workflow until the collaboration feels natural... then you can decide when to skip it. /model claude-opus-4-6 right there in the session and keep going. No restart. No re-explaining context. Just keep talking. :plan factory to match your naming convention. The failed_payment context stubs PaymentProcessor at the service boundary â let me know if you'd rather test through a VCR cassette. git checkout , not Ctrl+Z.ActiveSupport::TestCase , fixtures vs. factories, helper patterns.bin/rails test after writing. It'll iterate on failures in the same session.Testing: Minitest + fixtures (no FactoryBot) . Claude stops second-guessing your setup and you stop correcting it. orders(:pending) fixture to stay consistent with the suite. Want me to add edge cases for the status_code integer field? Invoiceable#finalize! but the root cause is in Checkout#complete â it calls order.finalize! without checking payment_captured? first. The concern assumes payment is confirmed by the time it runs, but your Stripe webhook is async...appsignal-cli , a Slack webhook, whatever) â it goes there.PaymentProcessor#charge! raises on decline but OrdersController#create only rescues Stripe::CardError . Your processor wraps it in a custom PaymentError that nobody catches...gh pr create inside the session once the description looks right.~/.claude/rules/git-conventions.md and everyone's AI-assisted commits look consistent. CartCalculator#total applied discounts after shipping...~/.claude/rules/git-conventions.md and Claude will do it automatically.fix/PROJ-841-cart-discount-codes fix: cart total ignores discount codes on free-shipping orders [PROJ-841] CartCalculator#total applying discounts after shipping calculation. Updated order: discount first, then shipping. Regression spec added in spec/requests/cart_spec.rb .Sometimes the most useful prompts are the weird ones. These are real things you can type into a Claude Code session when you want a fresh lens on the code in front of you. Whether Claude's interpretation of these voices is accurate... well, btw what do I know. But the outputs are usually interesting enough to be worth trying. CLAUDE.md is the briefing doc for this specific project: architecture, key commands, known quirks, WIP landmines. The actual conventions live in .claude/rules/ as separate files, each with paths: frontmatter that tells Claude Code when to load them. A Rails session never loads your frontend conventions. We keep shared team rules in a collaboration repository and symlink from ~/.claude/rules/ , and anyone on the team can propose improvements via PR.paths: = loads every session. Commit format, PR conventions..rb , app/ , spec/ .CLAUDE.md is the briefing doc for this project. The rules in ~/.claude/rules/ are the shared playbook that travels with the engineer. Keep them in a team repo, encourage PRs when someone finds something better, and let path-scoping handle the rest. If you dump everything into CLAUDE.md , every session loads everything whether it applies or not. Sorta. Robby baked in a bunch of lessons learned from real client and internal projects, then collaborated with Claude on the structure, copy, and examples. It's that kind of document. You could probably generate something like this yourself, too. And maybe you already did â in which case, feel free to reply on social media with "I already did this, Robby. You wasted your time!" It wil