PragerU의 대통령 가이드는 얼마나 나쁜가요? [동영상]

요약

1. **Analyze the Request:** * **Role:** News summarization expert. * **Task:** Summarize the provided text concisely. * **Constraints:** * Length: 2-4 sentences. * Focus: Most important information. * Prohibition 1: No copy-pasting. * Prohibition 2: No restating the title only; add new info. * Language: English. * **Input Data:** * Title: "How bad is the PragerU guide to presidents? [video]" * Source: "hackernews" * Article Text: "How bad is the PragerU guide to presidents? [video]" (Note: The article text provided is extremely brief, essentially just repeating the title and noting it's a video. There is no body text to summarize.) 2. **Analyze the Input Data:** * The user provided a title and a single line of text which repeats the title. * There is *no content* to summarize other than the fact that this is a Hacker News submission pointing to a video. * The prompt asks me to add information *beyond* the title, but the source text contains *no* information beyond the title. * *Self-Correction/Strategy Check:* I cannot invent facts about the video (e.g., "The video criticizes PragerU for misrepresenting Lincoln") because I don't have access to the video content itself, only the Hacker News post title. * *Constraint Conflict:* The prompt forbids "simply restating the title" and demands adding "new information." However, with zero body text, I cannot fulfill the "add new information" constraint factually based *only* on the provided text. * *Resolution:* I must explain *